Of Jews, rats and Gary Lineker

Whereof one knows nothing, thereof one must remain silent

Gary Lineker, prince among football pundits, avid retweeter of other people’s opinions, a man of more heart than he has sleeve to wear it on, does not like what’s going on in Gaza. ‘I just feel for the Palestinians,’ he says. To which the answer ‘Who doesn’t?’ is neither a rebuff nor an endorsement. There is nothing wrong with feeling what everybody feels. What’s wrong is believing that what you feel makes you right because you feel it.

Of the tortuous and tragic conflict between the Israelis and the Palestinians, Lineker has chosen to see neither the tortuousness nor the tragedy. ‘People say it’s a complex issue,’ he has declared, ‘but I don’t think it is.’

What then does Lineker see that others don’t? Or is it a question of what Lineker doesn’t see that others do? Either way, he has consistently promulgated an unwaveringly unsubtle pro-Palestinian, anti-Zionist position for which he has doughtily refused to apologize. Why should he? Wherein has he sinned? It is not as though he is an anti-Semite. Has not truth alone - truth at its most simple and unvarnished - been his guide?

But to go to war armed only with simplicity is to go to war naked. Not everyone will notice. Those whose nakedness you retweet certainly won’t. And in your own eyes there is no knowing what richly-attired heroism you see. But in the eyes of those who believe, with the poet Donne, that on a huge hill, cragged and steep, Truth stands, and he that will reach her about must and about must go - the once prolific goal scorer look ill-equipped to be a traveller among the rocky uplands of veracity.

‘A rat, a rat!’

Not a real rat, but an emoji. There, unashamedly wagging its tail for all to see, in the body of another of Lineker’s retweeted pro-Palestinian posts. ‘An antisemitic trope so brazen,’ in the words of the Sunday Times commentator Matthew Syed, ‘that I shan’t insult your intelligence by explaining why this is so.’

Brazen it might be, but Lineker misses it. Doesn’t see it. Doesn’t get it. Knows nothing of the long history of the rat in the iconography of Jew-loathing, a motif of particular appeal to the Nazis who could depict their ambition to wipe out the Jews as hygienic, since rats, as we all know, spread disease.

Which matters in the context of the Israeli Palestinian conflict why? Because whoever would talk of Zionism should know a little of what it was invented to save Jews from.

It isn’t difficult to see why the post in question initially excited Lineker’s interest. ‘Zionism explained in two minutes,’ it promised. A bit long, given Lineker’s refusal to see complexity, but the explanation when it comes takes only two seconds. ‘They take the land claim that it’s theirs.’

Gross enough as history without the rat emoji, with it there can hardly be any doubt, unless your’e Lineker, about the status of this two second ‘explanation’. The rat, so potent a symbol for the Nazis, has a new home in Arab propaganda. The Jew is once again the object of exterminationist ambition.

Whatever causes Lineker to realise at last what he’s put his name to - he a man, remember, with no malice against the Jews - he deletes the post and apologises. Bish bash bosh. No harm done. He didn’t know, that was all. Maybe all he saw was a cute mouse, wagging its tail. Credit where credit’s due. He acted. And said sorry. Sorry sorry sorry.

But sorry for what exactly?

For being found out? For not recognising one of the Nazis’ most infamous images? For briefly seconding the words of a Palestinian with whom the idea of the Jew as vermin sits easily.

None of us are as educated as we should be. And Lineker’s ignorance matters only because he charges into the fray of a bitter conflict without knowing, or wanting to know, anything of it apart from what can be gleaned from a two-second video produced by a party to one side whose only aim is to debase the other.

Lineker shouldn’t have needed the rat to tell him that the thing he ‘shared’ was odious. But you never know what form enlightenment is going to take. So listen to the rat, Gary. This is what it was trying to tell you. Dislike Zionism in its present iteration all you like, but to comment on what or why it is when you have scant knowledge of the murderous hatred that made it necessary - the desperation of exile and longing for home that finally brought it about - is like passing judgement on Black Lives Matter unaware there was a Slave Trade. You feel for the agony of the Palestinians, you say. Your compassion is admirable. Though compassion with understanding would be more admirable still. To be silent is to be complicit, you say. That is not a free pass to froth and fulminate all you like. To be ignorant is to be complicit too.

And now that you have admitted and apologised for what you were unaware of on this occasion, what about an apology for all those earlier know-nothing interventions you have made? Close your eyes and imagine a rat waving its tail at the bottom of every page you’ve posted. That’s a thousand sorries you owe us, Gary.

Oh, and put some clothes on.